中国弹道导弹可以瞄准几乎整个美国

中国弹道导弹可以瞄准几乎整个美国

作者: 时间:

标签:

正文翻译

Pentagon report: Chinese ballistic missiles can target nearly theentirety of the US

五角大楼报告:中国弹道导弹可以瞄准几乎整个美国

China now has dozens ofnuclear-capable missiles that could target almost the entirety of the US,according to the Department of Defense’s 2015 reporton the Chinese military.

据2015年美国国防部对中国军队的报告显示,中国现在已经有了好多可携带核弹头的导弹,可以瞄准几乎整个美国。

Thefollowing map from the report highlights the maximum missile ranges of China’smedium and intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs). The longest-ranging ofthe missiles, the CSS-4, can target almost the entirety of the US (except forFlorida).

报告中的地图强调了中国导弹介质和洲际弹道导弹(ICBMs) 的最大射程。导弹中射程最大的,CSS-4,可以瞄准几乎整个美国(佛罗里达除外)。
海国图志
TheCSS-4 has the largest range of any Chinese ICBM. The missile isnuclear-capable, according to the DoD report, and is housed in silos across the Chinese countryside.Beijing is estimated to have between 50 and 60 silo-based ICBMs.

CSS-4是中国洲际弹道导弹中射程范围最大的。据美国国防部的报告,该导弹可携带核弹头,安置在中国农村的筒仓里。中国估计有50-60个以发射井为基地的洲际弹道导弹。

Unlikethe other land-based missiles on the chart, the JL-2 is a sea-basednuclear-capable ballistic missile. Accordingto the DoD, the JL-2 will be carried by China’s future JIN-classballistic missile submarine as a nuclear deterrent. So far China hascommissioned four JIN-class submarines with a fifth one under construction. ThePentagon report expects the JIN to begin patrols in 2015.

图表中与其他路基导弹不同的是,JL-2是一个可携带核弹头的海基弹道导弹。据美国国防部报告,JL-2可能会由中国将来的”晋级”弹道导弹潜艇运载,作为一个核能威慑力量的存在。到目前为止,中国已经有四艘”晋级”潜艇处于服役状态中,正在建造第五艘。五角大楼的报告中,预计”晋”将会在2015年开始巡逻。
中国弹道导弹可以瞄准几乎整个美国
(Navy Office of Legislative Affairs)A Chinese JIN-class submarine

(海军立法事务办公室)中国”晋级”潜艇

The improvement in China’s nuclear deterrent has been spurred bydevelopments in countries that China might consider to be its strategiccompetitors.

中国核威慑力量的提高,是源于那些被中国当作其战略竞争对手国家的发展。

Chinamodernized its missile forces because of “continued advances in the USand, to a lesser extent, Russian strategic ISR [Intelligence, surveillance andreconnaissance], precision strike, and missile defense capabilities,” thereport notes.

该报告指出,中国的导弹力量不断现代化,是由于”美国的不断进步,以及再低一程度的,俄罗斯战略性的ISR[情报,监视和侦察],精准打击,以及其导弹防御能力,”。

Likewise,India’s own nuclear force has put pressure on China to continuously update andbetter its own capabilities.

同样的,印度本国的核力量也给中国带来了压力,让其不断地更新和提高自己的能力。

评论翻译

Russell 1 day ago

@FrankG – It would be agreat idea but would/will never happen. Everyone would assume, (and rightlyso), that everyone else is secretly building them and secretly build them also.I don’t think that there is a nuclear capable country in the world that wouldbe willing to give up the perceived benefit of being able to use them if theythought they needed to. Sad, but I think we all get to continue living ourlives wondering if/when our governments are going to start popping them off.

@FrankG-这是一个好主意,但可能永远都不会发生。每个人都会假设,(也理应如此),其他人也都在秘密建造这些武器,同时也在秘密提升自身能力。我不认为一个有核能力的国家,当 他们认为需要使用这些核能时,会愿意放弃就在眼前的好处。伤心,但我想我们会继续我们的生活,仍然好奇着我们的政府是否/何时会发射这些东西。

Guest 1 day ago
There is no newinformation here. Why is this a news ?
It is not the nukes that we should be worried about. We should be more worriedabout total dependence on Chinese made products and scale of Chinese military.China can bring down U.S economy without firing a nuke. Our defense industrycosts are 10 times higher than Chinese costs. If it takes us 200 million tobuild one F-35, they can make a copy in 20 million. Obviously the quality ofChinese made missiles and planes is questionable but they will surely outnumberU.S in every department. In coming decades, China will field more tanks,fighter planes, and combat ships than U.S.

这里都没有新消息。为什么这还称之为新闻?
我们该担心的不是核武器。我们应该担心的是完全依赖于中国的产品制造,以及中国军队的规模。不用发射一枚核武器,中国就可以打垮美国经济。我们的国防工业成本比中国的成本高出10倍。如果我们制造一个F-35需要2亿美元,那他们就可以用这笔钱生产出2000万个一模一样的。很显然,中国制造的导弹和飞机在质量上都存在问题,但是每一个部门上,他们的生产数量都会超过美国。在接下来的几十年里,中国将会拥有比美国更多的坦克、战斗机、战斗舰。

LaoShur 1 day ago
We’ll meet again,
Don’t know where,don’t know when,
But I know we’ll meet again, some sunny day.
Keep smiling through,
Just like you always do,
Till the blue skies drive the dark clouds, far away.
So will you please say hello,
To the folks that I know,
Tell them I won’t be long,
They’ll be happy to know that as you saw me go
I was singing this song.
WW2 song that expresses the fact that soon most of us will be dead.

我们会再相见,
不知道在何处,不知道在何时,
但我知道我们会再相见,在某个阳光灿烂的日子。
保持嘴角上翘,
就如你平日一样,
直到蓝天重现,乌云驱散至远方。
到那时,请对我熟知的人们,
说声”你好”,
告诉他们我不久就会来到,
他们得知后会和你看我离开时一样高兴,
而我正在唱着这首歌。
二战之歌表达了这样一个事实:我们大多数人很快就会死亡。

Lyle 1 day ago
What ever happen tocooperation and getting along . The world is not our enemy but partners inliving in this world. We all sure can destroy things but then what. We surehaven’t come too far from cave living when talk of destroying each other. Isn’tthere enough dead and destruction in the middle east to realize that there isno sense in it. People came to the USA to get away from the BS of the world andwe end up back in it. There has to be a better way before we all bomb eachother off the face of the earth. I am sad to say but the future looks bad.

说好的合作和友好相处都去哪儿了?这个世界不是我们的敌人,而是我们生活在这个世界上的伙伴。我们都很肯定可以摧毁一切,但然后又能怎样呢?当我们讨论说毁灭对方时,我们肯定也离穴居不远了。难道中东死的人和被毁灭的东西还不够多,不足以让我们意识到这样做毫无意义吗?人们来到美国是为了远离那些乱七八糟,而我们最终却回到这种局面。在我们将彼此炸得离开地球表面之前,肯定还有更好的解决方式。我很伤心,但不得不说,未来看上去很糟糕。

Scott 10 hours ago
u.s. should thank chinafor supporting it’s food stamps for years. i just don’t get why a borroweralways talk bad things about their lender & still has the face to putouttheir hands asking for financial support for years. what a loser

美国应该感谢中国,毕竟中国为它提供了好多年的食物救济。我就是搞不明白,为什么借方老是要说他们债权人的坏话,而且同时还有脸面伸手寻求多年的金融支持。真是个失败者。

robert a 11 hours ago
We can thank WilliamJefferson Clinton for that. He provided a waiver so the guidance systemtechnology could be handed over to them.

为此我们可以感谢威廉·杰斐逊·克林顿。是他提供了弃权证书,因此才能把制导系统技术转交给他们。

▐▀▀▼▀▀▌ ►P2◄ ▐▄▄▲▄▄▌ 1 day ago
I feel like I’m the onlyone who doesn’t see the future in the sword, but the shield.
A nuclear weapon, even in its infancy, was devastating, capable of killing tensof thousands in an instant, and millions more over time with radiation. Even ifdetonated above a target, the EMP effects could send the victims into the darkages for weeks, if not longer. Better weapons just mean more energy beingreleased, more versatility in their deployment, but the end result hasplateaued as far as its usefulness is concerned.

The real method of countering this would be a completely new system, and I’m nottalking about an interception system either. There will be a technologicalcounter to nuclear weapons just as guns replaced swords and tanks replacedhorses. Something else will come along to make nuclear weapons obsolete, and itlikely will be defensive in nature. We already hold the offensive trump cardwith nukes, but it isn’t really a trump card if your country dies as well.

我觉得我是唯一一个没觉得未来是兵戎相见,而是各自架起保护罩的。
即使是在初始阶段,核武器也是具有毁灭性的,它能够在一瞬间杀死成千上万的人,随着时间的推移,所造成的辐射还能杀害数以百万计的人。即使是在目标上方引爆,电磁脉冲的影响也会让受害者经历好几周的黑暗时代,如果他没有直接瞎掉的话。更好的武器只是意味着释放更多的能量,更多功能性的部署,但就其效用而言,最终结果已趋于平稳。

对此进行反击的真正方法是一个全新的系统,而且我也并不是在谈论一个拦截系统。将会有一个与核武器相对应的科技,就像是用枪代替刀剑,用坦克更换马匹一样。将会有别的东西出现,从而取代核武器,而且很有可能本质上还会防守。我们已经拿到了核武器的进攻王牌,但如果连国家也灭亡了,这也将不再是一张真正的王牌。

Eddie 20 hours ago
It’s too late to doanything. I really hate Henry Kissinger

现在做什么都晚了。我真恨亨利·基辛格

J 1 day ago
We are falling behind inmissile technology because of our treaties with Russia which ban testing ofcertain types of ballistic missiles. China on the other hand doesn’t have thoserestrictions (even Russia might be cheating and developing better missiles).

我们之所以在导弹技术上落后了,是因为我们与俄罗斯之间的条约,禁止某些类型的弹道导弹的测试。而另一方面,中国就没有这些限制了。(甚至就连俄罗斯可能也在偷偷研发更好的导弹)。

原创翻译:龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.com 翻译:太棒了!Angela 转载请注明出处
论坛地址:http://www.ltaaa.com/bbs/thread-346044-1-1.html

版权声明:

海国图志的所有内容仅用于学习和交流目的。

非商业转载请注明出处,并保留文章在海国图志的完整链接。